Metromix LA Blog

We're pathologically social. We're professional leisurists. We're burrito lovers, bar flies, art whores and music nerds. We dish the good dirt, and we'll risk a parking ticket for a cheap sample sale. Sometimes, we blog drunk.

May 06, 2008 8:53 PM

This Angeleno ain't so mild

Photobucket

 

Hey NY, it's not a taco cart—it's a taco truck.

Photobucket

That’s just the tip of the willful ignorance that’s displayed in Jennifer Steinhauer’s report of the taco truck resistance for The New York Times. As the venerable rag’s Los Angeles bureau chief, Ms. Steinhauer must have self-imposed a quota for epithets directed to the city of which she writes but in which she obviously wants no part.

How else to explain that starting from the headline “In Taco Truck Battle, Mild Angelenos Turn Hot” to the first 15 words in, “Los Angeles, loath to rally cohesively around a local cause, has joined hands around tortillas,” she manages to get in three potshots, aimed at stereotypical notions of the city’s indifference, its disunity, and its absurd obsessions—in this case, leading to a kumbaya session about a circle of masa.

She’s on a roll: “This a (sic) where you can pave over a freeway’s carpool lanes with toll roads, and few will complain. You can propose a 40-story skyrise in the center of Hollywood, and hardly anyone two miles to the west will take notice. You can squander public money, close down the ports and flatten landmarks, and many residents of this sprawling metropolis will simply yawn and move on.” Good one, Jen: we’re so laidback, we couldn’t give a crap. We’ve never heard that one before.

In drawing upon predictable stereotypes, Steinhauer presumes that food is not in itself political. While we stupid Angelenos fail to notice real issues like architectural blights on our skyline or the mismanagement of municipal funds, the food-obsessed have rallied around something as inconsequential as taco “carts.” Steinhauer at once minimizes the gravity of the issue and the accompanying call-to-arms while also failing to recognize that food plays a significant role in dispensing culture. And in a place as complex as L.A., food is the first, if not only, ambassador that enables communication between disparate and varied communities.

Yes, taco trucks are about as authentic or integral to Mexican cuisine as bacon-wrapped hot dogs from a mini cart. But like those hot dog carts—which are a far cry from the NYC street carts that Steinhauer must be used to—they are but one representation of the resourcefulness and fortitude that sustain L.A.’s immigrant communities.

What’s patently clear is that Ms. NYT-L.A.-bureau-chief has little experience with our city's street food. A truck is hardly the same as a cart—the difference is but too real for vendors who have yet to save up for one. Moreover, tacos have little to do with the Spaniards. Indeed, when it comes to writing about California, The New York Times would do well to reconsider its style convention: Please, please stop calling them Hispanics.

Jiyeon Yoo

Posted by Jiyeon Yoo at May 06, 2008 8:53 PM
Categories: 789
Permalink: http://blogs-losangeles.metromix.com/66/post/2456/
Trackback URL: http://blogs-losangeles.metromix.com/vmix_hosted_apps/66/post/2456/trackback/
Comments
One word: SNAP!
Posted By: Miss Alie | May 06, 2008 10:28 PM

Bless you, Jiyeon, for saying what I thought but didn't blog: her story was patronizing, and full of poorly disguised disdain. Good on you for calling her out.
Posted By: lucinda | May 06, 2008 10:33 PM

The article was insulting and condescending (how about "A new county ordinance restricting taco trucks has outraged food bloggers, construction workers, residents of East Los Angeles accustomed to plopping down in a folding chair, taco in one hand, nonalcoholic sangria in the other, as well as members of the taco-loving public willing to drive 15 miles for the best carnitas."? Thank you for responding so succinctly. It's a shame that the NYT can be both so snotty and so ignorant.
Posted By: Jennifer | May 07, 2008 9:30 AM

hear hear!
Posted By: kelvlam | May 07, 2008 9:57 AM

I'm an Angeleno, born and raised, and I agree with Steinhauer that being up-in-arms about the whole taco trucks having new laws in unincorporated sections of Los Angeles is inconsequential. It's just people pretending to be activists without actually doing anything. It's like, if you wanted to truly make a difference in the environment, you'd hop on the bus, instead of just walking around showing everyone your cool new canvas bag that you use at the market. Protesting "the man" trying to ruin taco trucks BY EATING AT A TACO TRUCK must have been really tough. Gandhi would be impressed.
Posted By: Andrew | May 07, 2008 11:39 AM

This is typical of the New York Times, who, in an article about a friend of mine, insinuated that he was a drug addict who neglected his children, because of an idiotic misunderstanding THEY made about the title of his blog. The NYT was impressive once, but that was decades ago. They have been coasting ever since.
Posted By: Scott Mercer | May 07, 2008 9:36 PM

I enjoyed several tacos from my local truck last Thursday. I read MetroMix on a regular basis. For the most part, I appreciated this blog. However, speaking as a professional editor, if you want to throw down about NYT's stylistic choice regarding the reference to Latinos or Hispanics, please refer to the A.P. style on the issue, wherein I'm fairly sure it states that Hispanic continues to be the preferred word.
Posted By: J | May 07, 2008 11:44 PM

A million people showed up protesting anti-immigration in LA last year. I don't get the stereotype of LA apathy.
Posted By: dt | May 08, 2008 12:02 AM

Re: Latino or Hispanic The most recent AP Stylebook does not favor Hispanic over Latino. The guideline is to follow the person's preference if possible, and also to use more specific identification when possible. In any case, the NYT does not follow AP style; it follows its own house style.
Posted By: Oliver | May 08, 2008 11:20 AM

Spicy! Leave it to the brilliant Jiyeon Yoo to challenge the New York Times to think about the quality of their content, their usage of the word "Hispanics" and (hopefully) once and for all shatter the stereotype of Angelenos too busy "livin' la vida loca" to give a damn about anything.
Posted By: Marcos | May 08, 2008 1:49 PM

In addition to the "cart" reference, I was struck by the reporters mention of sangria at a taco truck. Really? Most just carry horchata, tamarindo and coca cola. I'm suspecting that she has never been to a real taco truck. As for Latino v. Hispanic. The LA Times has been using Latino for thirty years because there is a long-held, well-articulated preference for that term in California, where the LA Times is based and where Latino are also (like 50% of the US Latino pop). There is no similar "preference" in NY for Latino over Hispanic, but there is no discussion about it either. The NY Times' resistance to the term reflects inattention to the issue and unrealistic sense of NY City's importance on this (and many other) topics. Which is fine, if they just admit that they are NY paper. But if they are the national paper that they claim to be (and have been historically) and it is definitely not fine.
Posted By: xoco | May 08, 2008 3:06 PM

She probably thought the Jamaica drink was non-alcoholic sangria. Not even close. Jamaica is made from hibiscus flowers and is never alcoholic. We all know about the sangria, ...
Posted By: xoco | May 08, 2008 3:21 PM

i hated this article in the ny times and i'm glad to see someone take it on.
Posted By: coro | May 09, 2008 10:59 AM

thank you so much for writing this. i had a friend from NY email me this article and when i read the first sentence, my eyes rolled. i hope the LAT starts a story with a smiliar stereotype one day, like "Pushy New Yorkers, never known for slowing down to smell the roses, are known to stop their honking at cabbies and hollering at pedestrians when they smell a hot dog."
Posted By: Milla | May 09, 2008 1:42 PM

One more thing this article got wrong. I will strongly dispute the last quote (and apparently, the last “word” on this subject) by a woman claiming that taco trucks are not an integral part of Mexican culture. Itinerant vendors (in mercados and corner stalls) have long been an important part of Mexican cuisine. The "truck" aspect is the only new American contraption -- and a fine one at that! As for the humble taco itself I would say that it is an integral aspect of Mexican working-class and migrant culture (i.e. the kind of people who live in East L.A.). Sure, the taco is not held in high regard in Mexico – as say, mole or birria certainly are – but that is because it is essentially lunch food for the working man and the migrant. But just about any packed lunch in central and southern Mexico has long consisted of some delicious mixture of whatever meat was available (or beans or potatoes or nopales if that is all that was available) wrapped in a tortilla. In northern Mexico, they wrapped it in a big flour tortilla and called it a Burrito. But so many stories of my grandfather’s travels in the early twenty century from Jalisco to Los Angeles involve details of what kind of tacos were packed for him on that particular journey, …And so many of my own memories of the school lunches packed for me by mother involve certain kind of tacos and burritos (eggs and nopales are the best, by the way), … that I just cannot let that line about taco and taco trucks not being part of my culture go unchallenged.
Posted By: xoco | May 09, 2008 2:46 PM

OWNED!
Posted By: manda | May 09, 2008 11:36 PM



Leave a comment
Name:
Email Address:
URL:
Comment:
Image Verification


Please enter the random text above to prove you're human and not a robot. Can't read the text? Click here to get new text.
 

Blogs Search

About Blogger

If it’s battered, crunchy and fried, Jiyeon Yoo is probably eating it.

Calendar

<May 2008>
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
 
 
 
 
3
4
7
8
10
11
14
17
18
22
24
25
27
31

Archived posts for this blog

More